The crusades, the Spanish inquisitions, and radical Christianity.

Radical Christianity:

I have heard this time after time after time. But is Christianity radical? There are such thing as extremists and radicals in every religion and belief system. Even atheism, people like Richard Dawkins would be considered a radical extremist atheist for his viciousness and calling all atheists to revolt and fight religion. But should people blame Christianity for the people who are extreme? Not at all. Many atheists say that there is no difference between radical Christianity and radical Islam. My challenge to those people who say that is this, why don't you go to Saudi Arabia and say that, I doubt you won't make it out alive. Atheists like to push there dogma into our society too and they insult Christianity right in front of everyone's face. But we don't kill, or want to kill. Those Christians who do are not really Christians and don't follow the teaches of Jesus Christ.

The crusades and Spanish inquisitions:

Ugh, so many people bring up the crusades and the inquisitions in a way to defend there skepticism. I just wanted to make it very clear. THE CRUSADES WERE NOT CHRISTIAN!

I am sorry if Catholics are reading this, but if we are going to blame someone for the crusades, it would be the catholic church. Now, times do change, and in fact, the pope publicly apologized for the crusades long ago. I do not blame Catholics, I blame the catholic church. I'm sure no catholics today will kill anyone in the name of Christ. If you look at history, and in today's world. The Papacy has been linked to the New World Order and the roll of the catholic church is only fulfilling Bible prophecy.

Jesus Christ said those who live by the sword will die by it. And if you look at the roll of Jesus, he was all for peace. So why would it be okay for a Christian to kill in the name of Christ? Simple, it isn't okay. It went against the Will of God. The catholic church obviously rejected Christs teachings and disobeyed there own God. The Romans just hijacked Christianity to use it for control. The purpose of Christianity was not to control, like many believe religion is for. Well, Christianity is not a religion and why would a big, thick book be "made up" to control people?

I just had to make that clear about the crusades. They were very Antichrist and I am embarrassed that they did such a thing in the name of Christ. Did you know that the Christendom soldiers use to call themselves "knights of Christ"?

You can't blame Christianity for all this. Some of the most evil men of earth's history have been atheists. Joseph Stalin and Pol Pot being 2 examples. Now, atheists usually say that that these men never killed in the name of atheism or that these men were just truly evil and I would have to agree with them. But it is obvious that they had no moral backbone and wanted to create an atheistic utopia. These men were truly evil, but how did they become so evil? Could atheism be an influence to do so? Just something to think about. Many Christians bring up Hitler as another example but atheists respond by saying that he was a roman Catholic.

I don't believe Hitler was a Roman Catholic. He could of lied for 1, and for 2, if he was he didn't follow the teaches of Christ. I mean he killed the Jews, that doesn't make sense. If he titled himself Roman Catholic, does this mean you should blame Christianity? And like I said, he didn't follow the teaches of Christ, so what influenced him to do this? It is obvious he was just evil and had different plans, even if he was a Christian. No where in the Bible does it say you should do what Hitler did.